Studio spaces have their limitations, but one of the best
things about Pam Tanowitz’s “Dream Sequence (No
Secrets),” shown at City Center Studio 5 on Tuesday
night, was the way she and her production designer,
Philip Treviño, made the space feel as if it was the only
possible setting for the work.
The transformation of the ordinary practice area was
subtle but effective: white slipcovers over the L-shaped
rows of seating, a white curtain across one side of the
studio and curtains drawn over the mirrors on another
wall. A door frame hung with a sheet of shiny silver
strips stood alone at the back, a portal to and from the
world of performance.
It was an appropriately clean, spare environment for Ms.
Tanowitz’s clean, spare choreography, and the effect was
rather like artistic green tea: cleansing and beneficial and
a little ascetic. But this wasn’t immediately apparent at the
start of “Dream Sequence,” which begins with a duet for
Anne Lentz and Glen Rumsey to slow lines of electronic
sound by Dan Siegler. (Mr. Siegler’s music alternates with
excerpts from Paul Dukas’s “Péri,” and Heinrich von
Biber’s Passacaglia for solo violin. Like much else in this
work, the choices are careful and just right.)
The pairing of Ms. Lentz and Mr. Rumsey offers more
emotional texture than the rest of the piece, perhaps
because of Mr. Rumsey’s slightly fey yet intense presence, which nicely counterbalances Ms. Lentz’s cool
aloofness as they move, alone and together, through the
clear balletic phrases that characterize the choreography.
Those phrases — the deep pliés used as transitions, the
carefully posed pauses — are strongly reminiscent of
Merce Cunningham’s work. But small shifts of the hips,
twisty limping runs and fouettés performed with a
hunching upper body provide little disjunctive moments
amid the smooth, clear balletic flow.
Like a classical ballet, the piece is divided (at least on
paper) into “Act I” and “Act II,” each comprising four
sections and bridged by a brisk “intermission dance,”
performed to country music with the lights turned up.
Ms. Tanowitz smoothly links these sections, often by
leaving one dancer onstage to join the next group, but
she is less successful in creating a sense of an inevitable
theatrical whole over the length of the work. This is
particularly evident at the end, when she introduces a “chorus” of five women in black as the dancers open the
curtains over a mirror, and at the side, where more rows
of slipcovered chairs are revealed.
It’s a nice touch, both conceptually and aesthetically,
but it feels unconnected to anything else in the piece. In
the end “Dream Sequence” feels more interesting to think
about than it does in the moment: an indication that Ms.
Tanowitz is talented enough to do more.